First I set the text to highlight Campos y Ruedos appeared this weekend on their site, signed by the hand of the editor. and then we talk about it (many have already read in situ but not to publish it is already being accused of not putting the leg, I explain elsewhere on "pinchos los del ciego" Why here and not there that I decided to position myself).
National Observatory of bullfighting culture was born March 22, 2008. Its main objective was admitted "to study, protect and promote culture taurine in all its forms. In other words: To bring forth the bull by the community as a cultural minority respectable because of its rich heritage and its importance "(in FSTF). Written in clearer terms, it was primarily to defend against attacks from anti-bullfighting. Since its inception, a large number of entities bull - with or without a national echo - has joined the ONCT in a large bull elk ecumenism of good quality even if we can not help thinking that making the aficion union of a project is too idealistic (which unfortunately the circumstances do not leave not to show us every day). The same, March 22, 2008, and with the consent, we imagine, of all entities that you represent, has been appointed president of ONCT the facilitator of a global Internet media company whose logo French bullfighting n is not unlike the one chosen by the Centre .... And for good reason: it is the same! Surrounded by a substantial number of vice-presidents (Olivier Baratchart for coordination with the parliamentary group, Alain Dervieux for coordination with UVTF Marcel Garzelli, for the coordination of collective and days of claim, Jean-Michel Mariou for television production, Roger Merlin for Economic Studies and coordination with Pronatura Noah and the Committee, Reynald Ottenhof for the coordination of legal matters, Francis Wolff, for the animation of the scientific, Francois Zumbiehl for cultural actions, manifests and publishing projects), it embodies, literally and figuratively, and him above all else, the ONCT which he is the spokesperson seems wherever necessary and even beyond, providing the good word e orbi urbi. It occupies a role of unifying forces (or less sharp) aficion the face of attacks, too bright (or less vivid), associations militating against bullfighting. In a world entirely controlled by the intricacies of the communication of sound, it does you will have noticed that the multiplicity of functions of the President (leader of a global Internet media information bullfighting bullfighting local radio host, communicating to a large arena southeast) and the controversy it arouses in its "cap" of "journalist" seriously harms the image of ONCT and credibility of its president as the embodiment of unity aficion. There is no need to compile an exhaustive list of mistakes "journalism" of the president, so that we can just remember, for illustration, that: - he defended his time in the argument that minors under 15 years should be accompanied by their parents able to attend bullfights and novilladas ...
- he wrote that the pike Andalusian was less destructive than the one currently used, basing his opinion on the results observed by veterinarians at the bullfighting corrida de Victorino Martin at Beaucaire in 2008, while failing to publish them in their its entirety on Internet media. However, upon reading these results we realizes that there is clearly stated that the pike who caused the deepest wound is a pike Andalusian (6th toro). It is also written (in the report by Dr. Bourdeau) than to get an idea of the effects of Andalusian pic, it should conduct a very broad and that nothing could be said for the moment in this case .- he wrote a novillada Moreno de Silva was badly out in Madrid (without attending the course!) and the ganadero, shame or resentment, had left the arena before the end of the show. The falsity of such allegations has been proven hereby .- recently, he attacked the choice of bulls selected by the Commission Taurine Orthez, solely on the basis of the commentary of a race of that holding to Pioz in 2008, published on one of English that these blogs dedicated to public obloquy usually (but not daring to mention by name) is no more evidence that he also allowed, in a very unwelcome digression which everyone can judge the elegance rare, to judge a hypothetical increase in local taxes (implying that this increase is linked to the cost thing taurine) in the same town of Orthez. Also, is it reasonable to imagine that the president of such an observatory, dedicated to fans rallying behind the banner of unity, has continued his journalistic activities, saying on its Internet media at whose head he "change hats" and of course by displaying the will to reduce the unhealthy world of aficionados to a battlefield simplified and simplistic Manichaeism draped between so-called good and bad fans (the latter recently even called "great terminally ill)? Is it intellectually acceptable to advocate a large rally side and take red ball with a false argument on those who do not share their opinions or analysis of another side? The safeguard provided in the statutes of the ONCT (written by this same President) and on the absence of intervention in "internal affairs" does not confine and even a sort of split personality of aficion . This is not making (imposing) sing a refrain of the Languedoc, in the compound of a plaza de toros or six thousand fans, the defense will assert bullfighting. Trumpeting of us (fans) when there no opposition returns to sodomize the Diptera. A plaza de toros was never intended to become a place of demands of this style. The street is for this because this is, after all, a struggle (or a debate) policy. The only claim that can occur in an arena is respect for the integrity of the show which one is present. The defense of the bullfight, even and especially in front of the anti-bullfighting goes through a long struggle against the excesses of "internal" afeitado, arreglado excessive, 1st third desecrated and poorly conducted, the age limit ... toros). This safeguard of non-intervention reduces ONCT a nice toy aficionados and complacent that divert their gaze from what is essential and leave the spotlight to those who make the bullfight: breeders, bullfighters, empresas.En this month of February 2009, when the 'ONCT will appeal to aficionados of individual memberships (thus broaden its base), it is quite clear that the president has proven he has no place as president. To remain credible in the eyes of the aficionados that it is still used today, it is in the interest of the ONCT to dispense with the services of its president, who seems to have much to do elsewhere. Instead of the latter is a less involved in the affairs of mundillo he should appoint the head of your Observatoire.Bien to you.
team Campos y Ruedos.
good. al grano.
Firstly, I agree. approach, a retrospective of mistakes and mixtures of genres sulfur. also point out that the opposite of this situation in the bullfighting world, would be the exception. So the only andré viard is not a fanatic backpacking to the paradise of business integrity of bullfighting. especially since:
-his magazine is of great quality.
-some of his editorials on the site are excellent, worked, weighted, informed and steeped in aficion. I give him no accésit, it does not needed in terms of "bullfighting speaking" but the bathwater and the baby ...
he was elected by a CA to an entity formed in 1901 with associated law statutes and rules. interfere to interfere in choosing not only "head of Turkey" would be objectionable in relation to my conception of democracy. the change of president is to leave the voting members of the association. do not belong, I only ask that everyone take responsibility. go beyond it to the game of witchcraft trials.
then I must admit two things:
one, that some comments or positioning CYR bother me. thousands of anonymity. some glitches (charges against Marcel Garzelli, use of derogatory terms such as "cyanide bullfighting" pulling in the same direction as the apostrophe viard writing "great terminally ill" about some aficionados). it's a shame, a bullet in the foot it is also unclear whether it is from the opposing camp as his own camp.
two, having had discussions with Andre Viard via Internet only (but I always use my real identity in all of my emails or comments) which were always courteous and often interesting but had little to do with October, we do not know personally, I can only rely on what he has publicly stated or published simply say that it seems possible to remove such conviction: our man advocates a lots of beautiful things ethical and moral and tries to apply to him perhaps - but even he fails to reconcile with some of his actions (and There I joined the team CYR).
well, this morning, in his editorial, he wrote something very finely turned and that seems the result of an observation of a high acuity: he speaks of the humility imposed by the campo and its "faenas. very well.
but if we take the recent tribulations of the author of this new bull Taoism, we must recognize that we are far from the account when the application of its own precepts in his daily activities. so it becomes the guarantor of everything, even our own humility. he proposed in his model but he does not try to understand whether other humility have no value as important as his. humility is incestuous. without otherness. and I still think that this operation extends to other positions or beliefs that is forged. unfortunately. I say unfortunately because I think his participation in city affairs taurine, taurus politics, is nothing trivial or improper, to the contrary.
I will also take this discussion to discuss what in my antiévolutives shows the contradictions of the politics of President in October
scrapped it long and up to obloquy Sieur Colmont, director of "echo callejon's "(and vice versa, especially for assorted other grounds). now both seem to have found a modus vivendi of good quality. why not accept it does is that the idiots who do not change mind? and let be watching him sympathetically as an approximation ultimately good for the peace of the "land of bullfighting? but did he simply tried not to treat with contempt the so-called" Ayatollahs "or" fundamentalist "or even" great terminally ill "that he must know the integrity and aficion? why settle for a step towards a character in a staggering stupidity flanked by his bad faith and his intolerance , Embellished with small-time legal?
he explains himself.
it will be difficult with the foot caught in such a carpet.
here. by writing this I mean this: "But who are you to allow you to write so many things that obviously you do not take no ownership, no risk, no involvement?".
what I say and again with pride
"nothing".
and add:
"but not anyone."
's all.
ludovic pautier "el ciego"
